Financial statement auditing analysis Case Study

fiscal statement auditing analysis - Case Study ExampleThis essay seeks to examine five areas of heightened audit lay on the line relating to the audit of the Havelock Company under study.As a point of departure, the management commentary on credit entry and liquidity stakes indicates existence of unsound control systems on revenues and the general expenditure of the company. This study will centralise on the profitability, liquidity, financial leverage, working capital and valuation ratios. These instruments are essentially the reflection of the companys financial position in terms of control system management. This follows that analytical examination of the ratios will adjoin a fundamental role in exhibiting the potential risks areas of Havelock Company (RODGERS, 2007).These ratios include Gross profit margin, operational margin and net profit margin. These ratios aid in investigating profitability status of an organization through comparison of the income aspects with sales . This follows that, upon examining and comparing Havelock Companys profitability ratios of 2011 and 2012, auditing assumptions will be made consequently, identifying the possible risk audit areas (VOGEL, 2007).The gross margin profit implies that the amount of sales revenue which remains after the represent of goods. The ratios above indicate the in 2011 the sales revenue left was significantly low compared to 2013. There is a shift from -0.36 to 0.07. This tells the auditors that the significant change should be widely investigated, particularly on the element of sales. The significant localise of the sales revenue remained might be investigated based on sale of goods of other brands from outside, hence creating a backlog of the companys goods. This is a potential audit area for Havelock Company, which might be attributed to issues of revelation (VOGEL, 2007).These ratios aid in establishing the companys capacity to meet its short-term debts. The current ratio for Havelock went take in from 5.43 in 2011 to 2.88 in 2012. This implies that the